DAD/NPG
← Learn & References

GUIDE 03 / PREPARE / 4 MIN

Make the sequence easy to follow.

Prepare a balanced chronology for your own review or a conversation with a lawyer.

DAD/NPG editorial guidance · Reviewed

No independent clinical or legal review. Our editorial standards

Practical guidance: general organization · Official references: California

KEEP THIS IN MIND

Put events in order, connect them to sources, and keep unanswered questions separate from conclusions.

Choose the purpose and date range.

Start by writing one sentence about what you want to review: for example, “Scheduled calls and their outcomes during October.” A defined range helps you avoid mixing a current question with every disagreement in the relationship.

This is a preparation method, not a filing template. Ask your lawyer or the court’s self-help center what format and supporting material are needed for a particular proceeding.

Build a chronology that can be checked.

  1. Sort by the date the event happened. Keep the date you entered or corrected it separate.
  2. For each event, identify the arrangement, what occurred, your response and the outcome.
  3. Attach or reference the relevant source rather than copying the same document into every entry.
  4. Mark approximate dates and reported information clearly. Do not invent precision to fill a gap.
  5. Include relevant events that do not support your initial impression, including completed contact, changed arrangements and your own missed commitments.

Show the whole sequence.

Fictional chronology

October 12 · Scheduled call was not completed; one follow-up sent. See E-001 and E-002. October 13 · A message proposed a replacement call for October 14. See E-002. October 14 · Replacement call took place from approximately 7:00–7:20 p.m. Pacific. Duration estimated from my note; call history available as E-003.

Including the replacement call gives a reviewer context that the first event alone does not provide. A sequence can help someone ask better questions; it does not establish why an event happened.

Make a separate list of questions.

Write down gaps you need help understanding. For example: “Which instruction applies to these attachments?” or “What additional context would help assess this sequence?” Keep those questions separate from the account of events.

Avoid presenting a count of missed events as proof of a legal violation. Orders, context, evidence and the applicable rules need their own review.

Review the exported copy.

A DAD/NPG export is a working record. Exporting or printing does not file it, serve it, or guarantee acceptance. Follow the current instructions for your court and ask for help when the requirements are unclear.

  1. Check the date range, time zones and event order.
  2. Confirm that filenames and internal references match the material you intend to share.
  3. Review page breaks and confirm that nothing is cut off when printed.
  4. Label fictional examples, estimates and corrections clearly.
  5. Save the version you shared, with its export date and intended recipient, in your private records.

REFERENCES / SCOPE

Check the official guidance.

The practical organization suggestions above are DAD/NPG’s editorial guidance. These official sources provide procedural context; they do not endorse this guide. California resources may not apply in other locations. Confirm current requirements for your court and situation.

  1. Documents for a family law hearing ↗California Courts · Self-Help Guide · California · Family law
  2. Child custody & parenting time ↗California Courts · Self-Help Guide · California · Family law
  3. Find a self-help center ↗California Courts · Self-Help Guide · California · Local support

Editorial review: October 16, 2026. This is not a legal review or a promise that linked requirements will remain unchanged. Report a correction.

Try it with one event.

Build a factual entry in the free timeline.

Open The Record ↗

KEEP GOING